Coffee consumption associated with lower risk of abnormal heart rhythm

Coffee consumption associated with lower risk of abnormal heart rhythm

Table of Contents

    Share

    A new prospective cohort study published by the American Medical Association (JAMA Internal Medicine) disputed a long held belief that coffee increases the risk of abnormal heart rhythms known as arrhythmias. Doctors have long been advising people with a history of abnormal heart rhythms (especially fast heart rhythms) to avoid consuming coffee due to concerns that it may increase the risk of causing an abnormally fast heart rhythm (e.g. supraventricular tachycardia).

    This new study assessed more than 300,000 participants and found that each additional daily cup of coffee is associated with a 3% reduced risk of developing an arrhythmia. The study also assessed genetic variations in caffeine metabolism amongst the study participants and found no significant group differences. Importantly, this study provides new evidence that habitual coffee consumption is associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia, and backs up evidence suggesting that coffee consumption is protective against heart disease.

    Is drinking coffee safe?

    While this study reveals new evidence suggesting coffee does not increase the risk of arrhythmia, those with a history of fast or abnormal heart rhythms should talk to their doctor before resuming a coffee binge. Why? Because this study was a population-based community study and did not assess people with existing cardiovascular disease.

    For the most part, evidence suggests that drinking coffee is overall protective against heart disease as well as other forms of cardiovascular disease. However, the decision to drink coffee is an individual one, and will depend on the health status of the individual. Coffee is not recommended for people with an established history of tachyarrhythmia (fast abnormal heart rhythm), nor those with conditions such as peptic ulcer disease and gastritis, and is known to increase symptoms of anxiety in people suffering from anxiety disorders.

    Previous evidence indicates coffee consumption reduces cardiovascular disease risk

    A meta-analysis conducted in 2013 assessed 35 cohort studies involving 1,283,685 participants. This large study showed that moderate coffee consumption was associated with lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, with the lowest CVD risk at 3 to 5 cups per day of coffee consumption. It also found that heavy coffee consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk. This is despite heavy coffee drinking also being associated with less healthy lifestyles such as higher rates of cigarette smoking, lower rates of physical activity and less healthy diets; confounders which further support the idea that coffee consumption is protective.

    References:

    1. Kim et al. Jul 2021. Coffee consumption and incident tachyarrhythmias: reported behaviour, Mendelian randomization, and their interactions. JAMA Internal Medicine. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/

    2. Ding et al. 2013. Long-term coffee consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/

    Leave a comment

    Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.

    What It Actually Does

    Ashwagandha is classified as an adaptogen - a substance that helps the body adapt to physical and psychological stress. But that description undersells the specificity of the evidence.

    In peer-reviewed clinical trials, ashwagandha root extract has been shown to:

    01

    Reduce serum cortisol levels significantly in adults under chronic stress

    02

    Support testosterone levels and muscle recovery in resistance-trained adults

    03

    Improve subjective measures of stress, anxiety, and wellbeing

    04

    Improve subjective measures of stress, anxiety, and wellbeing

    05

    Improve sleep quality and reduce time to sleep onset

    Why The Form Matters

    Here is where most supplement labels become misleading.
    The clinical trials that produced the evidence above didn't use generic ashwagandha root powder. They used standardised, patented extracts - specifically KSM-66® and Sensoril®, both of which are produced from roots using proprietary extraction methods that concentrate the active withanolides to a consistent, clinically meaningful level.
    Generic ashwagandha powder can contain anywhere from 1% to 8% withanolides. KSM-66® is standardised to a minimum of 5% withanolides with a full-spectrum root extract, which means it retains the natural balance of the plant's compounds rather than isolating one component.
    When you buy a supplement that says "ashwagandha" without specifying the extract form, you have no way of knowing whether it contains enough active compounds to do anything at all.
    At Arise, we use KSM-66® in every formula that contains ashwagandha. It's more expensive. It's worth it.

    Third-party Testing

    Supplements are not regulated the same way pharmaceuticals are. In most markets, a supplement company can put almost anything in a capsule and make almost any claim about it, as long as they don't claim to treat a specific disease.
    This is why third-party testing matters. It means an independent laboratory - one with no financial relationship to the supplement company - has tested the product to verify that:

    1. The ingredients listed are actually present
    2. They're present at the stated concentrations
    3. The product doesn't contain contaminants, heavy metals, or undisclosed substances

    Look for: NSF Certified for Sport, Informed Sport, or USP Verified certification on any supplement you take. These are the most rigorous third-party standards available.
    Every Arise formula is third-party tested before it reaches you. The results are available on request.

    The Honest Bottom Line

    Ashwagandha works. The evidence is genuinely strong. But the quality of the extract determines the quality of the outcome — and most of what's available on the market doesn't use the forms that the clinical research actually studied.
    Read the label. Ask for the extract form. Expect a specific answer.